The Washington Post Ran a Modification to Its Impairment Tale. Here’s Why It’s Nevertheless Incorrect.

The other day, TalkPoverty revealed a few severe issues with The Washington Post’s analysis that is recent of protection impairment advantages in rural America. Yesterday, The Post issued a modification alongside brand brand new calculations. Regrettably, you can still find major issues with their data—and their main thesis.

For beginners, The Post continues to over-count “working-age” beneficiaries by including over fifty percent a million individuals over 65—even including in certain those who are significantly more than 80 yrs. https://redtube.zone/es Old. More over, as opposed to utilizing the Census Bureau’s United states Community Survey (ACS)—what the Census calls “the leading source for detailed information regarding the United states people”—The Post uses a far less frequent information set The CDC’s “Bridged-Race Population Estimates” data set was created for the true purpose of allowing “estimation and contrast of race-specific statistics. ” It really is utilized by scientists whoever goal that is main to calculate consistent birth and death prices for small-sized racial and cultural groups—not at all exactly just what The Post’s analysis tries to do.
Read more …